Performance
management is an ongoing process. Performance management does not take place
just once a year. However, performance management is a continuous process
including several components. These components are closely related to each
other and the poor implementation of any of them has a negative impact on the
performance management system as a whole. The components in the performance
management process begins with prerequisites, performance planning, performance
execution, performance assessment, performance review.
The
first component of the performance management process involves two
prerequisites. First, there is a need to have good knowledge of the organisation’s
mission and strategic goals. This knowledge, combined with the knowledge of the
organization’s mission and strategic goals of one’s unit, allows employees to
make contributions that will have an positive impact on their units and on the
organization as a whole. Second, there is a need to have good knowledge of the
job in question. A job analysis allows for the determination of the key
components of a particular job: what task need to be done, how they should be
done, and what knowledge, skills, abilities (KSAs) are needed. If we have good
information regarding a job, then it is easier to establish criteria for job
success.
The
second component of the performance management process involves performance
planning. Performance planning includes the consideration of results and
behavior, as well as developmental plan. A discussion of results needs to
include key accountabilities, specific objectives for key accountability and
performance standards. A discussion of behaviors needs to include competencies.
Finally the development plans includes a description of areas that need
improving and goals to be achieved by each area.
The
third component is performance execution. Both the employee and managers are
responsible for performance execution. For an example, the employees need to be
committed to goal achievement and should take a proactive role in seeking
feedback from his or her supervisor. The burden is on the employee to
communicate openly and regularly with the supervisor. Also, the employee has a
responsibility to be prepared for the performance review by conducting regular
and realistic self-appraisals. On the other hand, the supervisors also have
important responsibilities. These including observing and documenting
performance, updating the employee on any changes in the goals of the
organization and providing resources and reinforcement so the employees can
succeed and continue to be motivated.
The
fourth component involves performance review when the employee and the manager
meet to discuss employee performance. Involvement of the employee in the
process increases his or her own ownership and commitment to the system. In
addition, it provides important information to be discussed during the
performance review. In the absence of self-appraisals, it is often not clear to
supervisors if employee have clear understanding of what is expected of them.
Lastly,
the fifth component involves performance review when the employee and manager
meet to discuss employee performance. This meeting is usually called the
appraisal meeting. This meeting typically emphasize the past: what the employee
has done, and how it was done. An effective appraisal meeting also focuses on
the present and future. The present involves the changes in compensation that
may results from the results obtained. The future involves a discussion on
goals and development plans that the employee will be expected to achieve
during the period before the next review session.
The
above explanation is essential for me to understand a bigger picture of
performance management of employees in organizations. This is due to my current
degree in Psychology requires me to understand first the performance management
process, a topic of Human Resources Management, as the groundwork before I can
able to comprehend application of HRIS in performance management